Introduction to SQLAlchemy - Pycon 2013 - Wrapup

April 04, 2013 at 12:10 PM | Code, Talks, SQLAlchemy

Introduction to SQLAlchemy - Pycon 2013

March 05, 2013 at 12:10 PM | Code, Talks, SQLAlchemy

Preparations are just about complete for my upcoming tutorial Introduction to SQLAlchemy. There's a good crowd of people already attending, and I think registration is still open in case more people want to sign up.

But in any case, if you are coming, this year there is prerequisite material, including the software installs as well as a "Relational Overview" section that covers the basics of SQL and relational databases. Everyone coming to the tutorial should read through this document, so that we're all on roughly the same page regarding upfront SQL knowledge, and try to get the software installed. If there's any issues with the software, please report bugs to me and we'll try to get them resolved by tutorial time. We will also be available at the Wednesday 6:30pm tutorial setup session to help with installs.

Historically, tutorials pack the whole three hours of material up pretty solidly, and I hope I can balance getting lots of coverage versus not talking too fast. Thanks for signing up !


Pycon Canada - the SQLAlchemy Session In Depth

November 14, 2012 at 08:31 AM | Code, Talks, SQLAlchemy

Video is up for my Pycon.ca talk, The SQLAlchemy Session - In Depth. In this talk, I delve into the key philosophies behind the design of SQLAlchemy's Session system. Starting with a brief review of the ACID model, I contrast the approach of the so-called "active record" pattern to that of the more explicit Session pattern, and how the two approaches integrate with the ACID model at work within a relational database. Afterwards, I present an HTML animation of a Session object at work.


Pycon 2012 : Hand Coded Applications with SQLAlchemy

March 12, 2012 at 12:01 PM | Talks, SQLAlchemy, Code

Here's the slides from my Pycon 2012 talk, "Hand Coded Applications with SQLAlchemy". I had a great time with this talk and thanks all for coming !

Update: Here's the video!


Patterns Implemented by SQLAlchemy

February 07, 2012 at 12:01 PM | SQLAlchemy, Code

When I first created SQLAlchemy, I knew I wanted to create something significant. It was by no means the first ORM or database abstraction layer I'd written; by 2005, I'd probably written about a dozen abstraction layers in several languages, including in Java, Perl, C and C++ (really bad C and even worse C++, one that talked to ODBC and another that communicated with Microsoft's ancient DB-LIB directly). All of these abstraction layers were in the range of awful to mediocre, and certainly none were anywhere near release-quality; even by late-90's to early-2000's standards. They were all created for closed-source applications written on the job, but each one did its job very well.

It was the repetitive creation of the same patterns over and over again that made apparent the kinds of things a real toolkit should have, as well as increased the urge to actually go through with it, so that I wouldn't have to invent new database interaction layers for every new project, or worse, be compelled by management to use whatever mediocre product they had read about the week before (keeping in mind I was made to use such disasters as EJB 1.0). But at the same time it was apparent to me that I was going to need to do some research up front as well. The primary book I used for this research was Patterns of Enterprise Archictecture by Martin Fowler. When reading this book, about half the patterns were ones that I'd already used implicitly, and the other half were ones that I was previously not entirely aware of.

Sometimes I read comments from new users expressing confusion or frustration with SQLAlchemy's concepts. Maybe some of these users are not only new to SQLAlchemy but are new to database abstraction layers in general, and some maybe even to relational databases themselves. What I'd like to lay out here is just how many of POEAA's patterns SQLAlchemy is built upon. If you're new to SQLAlchemy, my hope is that this list might help to de-mystify where these patterns come from.

These links are from Catalog of Patterns of Enterprise Architecture.

  • Data Mapper - The key to this pattern is that object-relational mapping is applied to a user-defined class in a transparent way, keeping the details of persistence separate from the public interface of the class. SQLAlchemy's classical mapping system, which is the usage of the mapper() function to link a class with table metadata, implemented this pattern as fully as possible. In modern SQLAlchemy, we use the Declarative pattern which combines table metadata with the class' declaration as a shortcut to using mapper(), but the persistence API remains separate.
  • Unit of Work - This pattern is where the system transparently keeps track of changes to objects and periodically flushes all those pending changes out to the database. SQLAlchemy's Session implements this pattern fully in a manner similar to that of Hibernate.
  • Identity Map - This is an essential pattern that establishes unique identities for each object within a particular session, based on database identity. No ORM should be without this feature, as working with object structures and applications of the most moderate complexity is vastly simplified and made more efficient with this pattern in place.
  • Metadata Mapping - this chapter in the book is where the name MetaData comes from. The exact correspondence to Fowler's pattern would be the combination of mapper() and Table.
  • Query Object - Both the ORM Query and the Core select() construct are built on this pattern.
  • Repository - An interface that serves as the gateway to the database, in terms of object-relational mappings. This is the SQLAlchemy Session.
  • Lazy Load - Load a related collection or object as you need it. SQLAlchemy, like Hibernate, has a lot of options in how attributes can load things.
  • Identity Field - Represent the primary key of a table's row within the object that represents it.
  • Foreign Key Mapping - Database foreign keys are represented using relationships in the object model.
  • Association Table Mapping - A class can be mapped that represents information about how two objects are related to each other. Use the Association Object for this pattern.
  • Embedded Value - a value inline on an object represents multiple columns. SQLAlchemy provides the Composite pattern here.
  • Serialized LOB - Sometimes you just want to stuff all the objects into a BLOB. Use the PickleType or roll a JSON type.
  • Inheritance Mappers - Represent class hierarchies within database tables. See Inheritance Mapping.
  • Optimistic Offline Lock - Set up a version id on your mapping to enable this feature in SQLAlchemy.

Thanks for reading!